Samenvatting
In theory, illiquid housing may substitute for long-term care insurance (LTCI) as retirees decumulate housing wealth mainly when moving to long-term care facilities. In this paper, I build and estimate a rich life-cycle model of single retirees in order to evaluate whether the impact of housing liquidity on LTCI demand is large. Overall, I find that the prospects of increasing LTCI demand by making housing more liquid are quite limited, as even large increases in housing liquidity generate modest increases in LTCI demand. I also find a limited impact of housing liquidity on the demand for life annuities. Finally, I show that the types of bequest motives used to rationalize the low take-up of reverse mortgages are generally inconsistent with the low demand for LTCI, suggesting that other factors may play a role in this low take-up of reverse mortgages.
| Originele taal-2 | English |
|---|---|
| Artikelnummer | 104353 |
| Aantal pagina's | 15 |
| Tijdschrift | Journal of Public Economics |
| Volume | 194 |
| DOI's | |
| Status | Published - feb.-2021 |
| Extern gepubliceerd | Ja |
Vingerafdruk
Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Housing liquidity and long-term care insurance demand: A quantitative evaluation'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.Citeer dit
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver