I Ought to Reply, So I Can

Bart Streumer

doi:10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2

I Ought to Reply, So I Can

Bart Streumer^*

^*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Ethiek, Sociale en Politieke Filosofie

Onderzoeksoutput › Academic › peer review

4 Citaten (Scopus)

114 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.

Originele taal-2	English
Pagina's (van-tot)	1547-1554
Aantal pagina's	8
Tijdschrift	Philosophy
Volume	47
Nummer van het tijdschrift	5
Vroegere onlinedatum	15-nov.-2018
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2
Status	Published - 2019

Toegang tot document

10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2Licentie: CC BY

I Ought to Reply, So I CanFinal publisher's version, 265 KBLicentie: CC BY

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Citeer dit

@article{9a44dc377cba47c5bdc9e95cb28138ea,

title = "I Ought to Reply, So I Can",

abstract = "I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.",

keywords = "EMPIRICAL REFUTATION, IMPLIES, REASONS",

author = "Bart Streumer",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "1547--1554",

journal = "Philosophy",

issn = "0031-8191",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - I Ought to Reply, So I Can

AU - Streumer, Bart

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.

AB - I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.

KW - EMPIRICAL REFUTATION

KW - IMPLIES

KW - REASONS

U2 - 10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2

DO - 10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2

M3 - Article

SN - 0031-8191

VL - 47

SP - 1547

EP - 1554

JO - Philosophy

JF - Philosophy

IS - 5

ER -