Impact of COVID-19 on Cardiovascular Testing in the United States Versus the Rest of the World

INCAPS COVID Investigators Group, Cole B. Hirschfeld, Leslee J. Shaw, Michelle C. Williams, Ryan Lahey, Todd C. Villines, Sharmila Dorbala, Andrew Choi, Nishant R. Shah, David A. Bluemke, Daniel S. Berman, Ron Blankstein, Maros Ferencik, Jagat Narula, David Winchester, Eli Malkovskiy, Benjamin Goebel, Michael Randazzo, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Purvi ParwaniJoao V. Vitola, Rodrigo Cerci, Nathan Better, Paolo Raggi, Bin Lu, Vladimir Sergienko, Valentin Sinitsyn, Takashi Kudo, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Yosef Cohen, Thomas N.B. Pascual, Yaroslav Pynda, Maurizio Dondi, Diana Paez, Andrew J. Einstein*

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

32 Citaten (Scopus)


Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-U.S. institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality.

Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States.

Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. 

Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1787-1799
Aantal pagina's13
TijdschriftJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Nummer van het tijdschrift9
StatusPublished - sep.-2021

Citeer dit