Kant's Response to Hume on Natural Theology: Dogmatic Anthropomorphism, Analogical Inference, and Symbolic Representation

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

Samenvatting

This article examines Kant’s response to the criticisms of natural the-
ology that Hume articulates in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Though
Kant was in agreement with the Dialogues’ rejection of dogmatic theism, he equally
viewed many of its arguments as a threat to his aim of constructing a critical theol-
ogy. Kant is often taken to have successfully diffused this skeptical threat on the basis
of a symbolic anthropomorphism articulated in the Prolegomena. However, I argue
that the Prolegomena account remains susceptible to Hume’s criticisms, and that it
was only several years later in the third Critique that Kant was able to show how the
Dialogues’ skeptical conclusions can be circumvented. In this manner, I aim to show
that Hume’s challenge is more significant, and Kant’s response more complex, than
has previously been acknowledged.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)77-101
Aantal pagina's25
TijdschriftJournal of the History of Philosophy
Volume61
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusPublished - jan.-2023
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Kant's Response to Hume on Natural Theology: Dogmatic Anthropomorphism, Analogical Inference, and Symbolic Representation'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit