TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning in English
T2 - A research synthesis on European countries with advanced English skills
AU - Heisterkamp, Penny
AU - Schüppert, Anja
AU - Baaijen, Veerle
AU - Michel, Marije
PY - 2025/9/3
Y1 - 2025/9/3
N2 - The purpose of this research synthesis was to map research on students' language skills and content learning in English as medium of instruction (EMI) contexts for countries with advanced English skills and wide use of EMI. Systematic searches resulted in a total of 38 relevant EMI studies conducted on the nine European countries meeting our selection criteria (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands). The studies identified various language- and comprehension-related challenges for students, but there was no clear (negative or positive) effect of EMI on students' content learning. Participant characteristics differed in how often they were reported on, and the influence of most characteristics was rarely considered in analyses. The studies showed a preference for the use of surveys, self-assessment, non-longitudinal designs, and descriptive statistics, and the majority did not include a comparison condition. To improve our knowledge of effects of EMI on student learning, future research would benefit from (a) considering and reporting participant characteristics carefully, (b) using more objective and specific measures of academic performance, and (c) analysing EMI students’ skills over time and in relation to a comparison condition.
AB - The purpose of this research synthesis was to map research on students' language skills and content learning in English as medium of instruction (EMI) contexts for countries with advanced English skills and wide use of EMI. Systematic searches resulted in a total of 38 relevant EMI studies conducted on the nine European countries meeting our selection criteria (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands). The studies identified various language- and comprehension-related challenges for students, but there was no clear (negative or positive) effect of EMI on students' content learning. Participant characteristics differed in how often they were reported on, and the influence of most characteristics was rarely considered in analyses. The studies showed a preference for the use of surveys, self-assessment, non-longitudinal designs, and descriptive statistics, and the majority did not include a comparison condition. To improve our knowledge of effects of EMI on student learning, future research would benefit from (a) considering and reporting participant characteristics carefully, (b) using more objective and specific measures of academic performance, and (c) analysing EMI students’ skills over time and in relation to a comparison condition.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101564
DO - 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101564
M3 - Review article
SN - 1475-1585
VL - 77
JO - Journal of English for Academic Purposes
JF - Journal of English for Academic Purposes
M1 - 101564
ER -