TY - JOUR
T1 - Macrozoobenthos as an indicator of habitat suitability for intertidal seagrass
AU - Gräfnings, Max L.E.
AU - Govers, Laura L.
AU - Heusinkveld, Jannes H.T.
AU - Silliman, Brian R.
AU - Smeele, Quirin
AU - Valdez, Stephanie R.
AU - van der Heide, Tjisse
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the benthos-lab of NIOZ and especially Loran Kleine Schaars for their help with macrozoobenthos identification. Paul van der Ven and Nelly Eck are acknowledged for their help with analyzing the porewater samples. This project was funded by Waddenfonds grant ‘Sleutelen aan zeegrasherstel’ and European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (project: MERCES, Marine Ecosystem Restoration in Changing European Seas; grant agreement #689518).
Funding Information:
We acknowledge the benthos-lab of NIOZ and especially Loran Kleine Schaars for their help with macrozoobenthos identification. Paul van der Ven and Nelly Eck are acknowledged for their help with analyzing the porewater samples. This project was funded by Waddenfonds grant ‘Sleutelen aan zeegrasherstel’ and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (project: MERCES, Marine Ecosystem Restoration in Changing European Seas; grant agreement #689518).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Seagrass meadows form the foundation of many coastal ecosystems, but are rapidly declining on a global scale. To conserve and restore these key-ecosystems, improved understanding of drivers behind seagrass presence and recovery is needed. Many animals are known to both facilitate and inhibit seagrasses, but biotic factors are still rarely used as indicators of seagrass presence. Hence, we investigate if macrozoobenthos could be used as an indicator for intertidal seagrass (Zostera marina and Zostera noltii) habitat suitability in the international Wadden Sea. Additionally, we explore if macrozoobenthos can explain the differing seagrass recovery rates that have been observed between the Northern (Denmark and Schleswig Holstein) and Southern (Lower Saxony and Netherlands) regions of the Wadden Sea. To achieve this, we performed a Wadden Sea-wide survey at 36 intertidal locations, across three countries, and investigated the importance of 21 abiotic and biotic variables in explaining the presence and absence of intertidal seagrasses. Seagrass presence or absence could be reliably predicted (prediction error: 16.7%) with a multivariate logistic regression with only four variables; chlorophyll a, bivalve, ragworm and mudsnail biomass. We also found higher chlorophyll concentrations and ragworm biomass in the South compared to the Northern Wadden Sea, suggesting that eutrophication and associated community shifts might still inhibit seagrass recovery in the South. Our findings highlight the potential of using macrozoobenthos as indicators for seagrass habitat suitability. In areas, like the Dutch Wadden Sea, where macrozoobenthic surveys are common and where benthic data is readily available, our findings can be used to improve the understanding of seagrass recovery dynamics and the selection of suitable seagrass restoration sites.
AB - Seagrass meadows form the foundation of many coastal ecosystems, but are rapidly declining on a global scale. To conserve and restore these key-ecosystems, improved understanding of drivers behind seagrass presence and recovery is needed. Many animals are known to both facilitate and inhibit seagrasses, but biotic factors are still rarely used as indicators of seagrass presence. Hence, we investigate if macrozoobenthos could be used as an indicator for intertidal seagrass (Zostera marina and Zostera noltii) habitat suitability in the international Wadden Sea. Additionally, we explore if macrozoobenthos can explain the differing seagrass recovery rates that have been observed between the Northern (Denmark and Schleswig Holstein) and Southern (Lower Saxony and Netherlands) regions of the Wadden Sea. To achieve this, we performed a Wadden Sea-wide survey at 36 intertidal locations, across three countries, and investigated the importance of 21 abiotic and biotic variables in explaining the presence and absence of intertidal seagrasses. Seagrass presence or absence could be reliably predicted (prediction error: 16.7%) with a multivariate logistic regression with only four variables; chlorophyll a, bivalve, ragworm and mudsnail biomass. We also found higher chlorophyll concentrations and ragworm biomass in the South compared to the Northern Wadden Sea, suggesting that eutrophication and associated community shifts might still inhibit seagrass recovery in the South. Our findings highlight the potential of using macrozoobenthos as indicators for seagrass habitat suitability. In areas, like the Dutch Wadden Sea, where macrozoobenthic surveys are common and where benthic data is readily available, our findings can be used to improve the understanding of seagrass recovery dynamics and the selection of suitable seagrass restoration sites.
KW - Ecological indicator
KW - Eutrophication
KW - Habitat suitability
KW - Macrozoobenthos
KW - Recovery
KW - Seagrass
KW - Wadden Sea
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147194201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109948
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109948
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147194201
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 147
JO - Ecological indicators
JF - Ecological indicators
M1 - 109948
ER -