TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs
AU - Dik, Jan-Willem H.
AU - Hendrix, Ron
AU - Poelman, Randy
AU - Niesters, Hubert G.
AU - Postma, Maarten J.
AU - Sinha, Bhanu
AU - Friedrich, Alexander W.
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) are being implemented worldwide to optimize antimicrobial therapy, and thereby improve patient safety and quality of care. Additionally, this should counteract resistance development. It is, however, vital that correct and timely diagnostics are performed in parallel, and that an institution runs a well-organized infection prevention program. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which interventions an ASP should comprise. Indeed this depends on the institution, the region, and the patient population that is served. Different interventions will lead to different effects. Therefore, adequate evaluations, both clinically and financially, are crucial. Here, we provide a general overview of, and perspective on different intervention strategies and methods to evaluate these ASP programs, covering before mentioned topics. This should lead to a more consistent approach in evaluating these programs, making it easier to compare different interventions and studies with each other and ultimately improve infection and patient management.
AB - Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) are being implemented worldwide to optimize antimicrobial therapy, and thereby improve patient safety and quality of care. Additionally, this should counteract resistance development. It is, however, vital that correct and timely diagnostics are performed in parallel, and that an institution runs a well-organized infection prevention program. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which interventions an ASP should comprise. Indeed this depends on the institution, the region, and the patient population that is served. Different interventions will lead to different effects. Therefore, adequate evaluations, both clinically and financially, are crucial. Here, we provide a general overview of, and perspective on different intervention strategies and methods to evaluate these ASP programs, covering before mentioned topics. This should lead to a more consistent approach in evaluating these programs, making it easier to compare different interventions and studies with each other and ultimately improve infection and patient management.
KW - A-teams
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - Antimicrobial stewardship
KW - expert review
KW - one health
KW - antibiotic resistance
KW - consensus
KW - human
KW - infection
KW - patient care
KW - antiinfective agent
U2 - 10.1080/14787210.2016.1178064
DO - 10.1080/14787210.2016.1178064
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27077229
SN - 1478-7210
VL - 14
SP - 569
EP - 575
JO - Expert review of anti-Infective therapy
JF - Expert review of anti-Infective therapy
IS - 6
ER -