TY - JOUR
T1 - MRI for diagnosis of post-renal transplant complications
T2 - current state-of-the-art and future perspectives
AU - Schutter, Rianne
AU - Lantinga, Veerle A.
AU - Borra, Ronald J. H.
AU - Moers, Cyril
PY - 2019/12/26
Y1 - 2019/12/26
N2 - Kidney transplantation has developed into a widespread procedure to treat end stage renal failure, with transplantation results improving over the years. Postoperative complications have decreased over the past decades, but are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Early accurate diagnosis and treatment is the key to prevent renal allograft impairment or even graft loss. Ideally, a diagnostic tool should be able to detect post-transplant renal dysfunction, differentiate between the different causes and monitor renal function during and after therapeutic interventions. Non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnostic purposes show promising results. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have a number of advantages, such as the lack of ionizing radiation and the possibility to obtain relevant tissue information without contrast, reducing the risk of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. However, most techniques still lack the specificity to distinguish different types of parenchymal diseases. Despite some promising outcomes, MRI is still barely used in the post-transplantation diagnostic process. The aim of this review is to survey the current literature on the relevance and clinical applicability of diagnostic MRI modalities for the detection of various types of complications after kidney transplantation.
AB - Kidney transplantation has developed into a widespread procedure to treat end stage renal failure, with transplantation results improving over the years. Postoperative complications have decreased over the past decades, but are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Early accurate diagnosis and treatment is the key to prevent renal allograft impairment or even graft loss. Ideally, a diagnostic tool should be able to detect post-transplant renal dysfunction, differentiate between the different causes and monitor renal function during and after therapeutic interventions. Non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnostic purposes show promising results. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have a number of advantages, such as the lack of ionizing radiation and the possibility to obtain relevant tissue information without contrast, reducing the risk of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. However, most techniques still lack the specificity to distinguish different types of parenchymal diseases. Despite some promising outcomes, MRI is still barely used in the post-transplantation diagnostic process. The aim of this review is to survey the current literature on the relevance and clinical applicability of diagnostic MRI modalities for the detection of various types of complications after kidney transplantation.
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Kidney transplantation
KW - Complications
KW - Renal allograft
KW - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY
KW - RENAL-ALLOGRAFT REJECTION
KW - ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
KW - DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI
KW - ACUTE TUBULAR-NECROSIS
KW - DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION
KW - STEADY-STATE
KW - IN-VIVO
KW - VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
KW - NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT
U2 - 10.1007/s10334-019-00813-8
DO - 10.1007/s10334-019-00813-8
M3 - Review article
SN - 0968-5243
JO - Magnetic resonance materials in physics biology and medicine
JF - Magnetic resonance materials in physics biology and medicine
ER -