Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation

J. Kirkegard*, E. K. Aahlin, M. Al-Saiddi, S. O. Bratlie, M. Coolsen, R. J. de Haas, M. den Dulk, C. Fristrup, E. M. Harrison, M. B. Mortensen, M. W. Nijkamp, J. Persson, J. A. Soreide, S. J. Wigmore, T. Wik, F. V. Mortensen

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

    OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

    27 Citaten (Scopus)

    Samenvatting

    Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings have been adopted widely to ensure optimal treatment for patients with cancer. Agreements in tumour staging, resectability assessments and treatment allocation between different MDTs were assessed. Methods: Of all patients referred to one hospital, 19 patients considered to have non-metastatic pancreatic cancer for evaluation were selected randomly for a multicentre study of MDT decisions in seven units across Northern Europe. Anonymized clinical information and radiological images were disseminated to theMDTs. All patients were reviewed by theMDTs for radiological T, N andMcategory, resectability assessment and treatment allocation. Each MDT was blinded to the decisions of other teams. Agreements were expressed as raw percentages and Krippendorff's.. values, both with 95 per cent confidence intervals. Results: A total of 132 evaluations in 19 patients were carried out by the seven MDTs (1 evaluation was excluded owing to technical problems). The level of agreement for T, N and M categories ranged from moderate to near perfect (46.8, 61.1 and 82.8 per cent respectively), but there was substantial variation in assessment of resectability; seven patients were considered to be resectable by one MDT but unresectable by another. The MDTs all agreed on either a curative or palliative strategy in less than half of the patients (9 of 19). Only fair agreement in treatment allocation was observed (Krippendorff's.. 0.31, 95 per cent c. i. 0.16 to 0.45). There was a high level of agreement in treatment allocation where resectability assessments were concordant. Conclusion: Considerable disparities in MDT evaluations of patients with pancreatic cancer exist, including substantial variation in resectability assessments.

    Originele taal-2English
    Pagina's (van-tot)756-764
    Aantal pagina's9
    TijdschriftBritish Journal of Surgery
    Volume106
    Nummer van het tijdschrift6
    DOI's
    StatusPublished - mei-2019

    Citeer dit