TY - JOUR
T1 - Offspring outcomes after prenatal interventions for common mental disorders
T2 - a meta-analysis
AU - Brouwer, Marlies E.
AU - Williams, Alishia D.
AU - van Grinsven, Sam E.
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Lambregtse-van den Berg, Mijke P.
AU - Burger, Huibert
AU - Bockting, Claudi L. H.
PY - 2018/11/15
Y1 - 2018/11/15
N2 - BackgroundIt is presumed that pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of prenatal common mental disorders can mitigate associated adverse effects in offspring, yet strong evidence for the prophylactic benefits of treatment is lacking. We therefore examined the effect of prenatal treatments for common mental disorders on offspring outcomes.MethodsFor this meta-analysis, articles published up to August 31, 2017, were obtained from PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Included studies needed to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of treatment of prenatal common mental disorders comparing an intervention to a control condition, including offspring outcome(s). Random effects models were used to calculate Hedges' g in the program Comprehensive Meta-Analysis((c)) (version 3.0).ResultsSixteen randomized controlled trials among 2778 pregnant women compared offspring outcomes between prenatal interventions and control groups. There were zero pharmacological, 13 psychological, and three other interventions (homeopathy, relaxation interventions, and short psycho-education). Birth weight (mean difference 42.88g, g=0.08, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.22, p=0.27, n=11), Apgar scores (g=0.13, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.54, p=0.53, n=4), and gestational age (g=0.03, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.54, p=0.49, n=10) were not significantly affected. Other offspring outcomes could not be meta-analyzed due to the inconsistent reporting of offspring outcomes and an insufficient number of studies.ConclusionsNon-pharmacological interventions had no significant effect on birth outcomes, although this outcome should be considered with caution due to the risk of biases. No randomized controlled trial examined the effects of prenatal pharmacological treatments as compared to treatment as usual for common mental disorders on offspring outcomes. Present clinical guidelines may require more research evidence on offspring outcomes, including child development, in order to warrant the current recommendation to routinely screen and subsequently treat prenatal common mental disorders.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42016047190
AB - BackgroundIt is presumed that pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of prenatal common mental disorders can mitigate associated adverse effects in offspring, yet strong evidence for the prophylactic benefits of treatment is lacking. We therefore examined the effect of prenatal treatments for common mental disorders on offspring outcomes.MethodsFor this meta-analysis, articles published up to August 31, 2017, were obtained from PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Included studies needed to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of treatment of prenatal common mental disorders comparing an intervention to a control condition, including offspring outcome(s). Random effects models were used to calculate Hedges' g in the program Comprehensive Meta-Analysis((c)) (version 3.0).ResultsSixteen randomized controlled trials among 2778 pregnant women compared offspring outcomes between prenatal interventions and control groups. There were zero pharmacological, 13 psychological, and three other interventions (homeopathy, relaxation interventions, and short psycho-education). Birth weight (mean difference 42.88g, g=0.08, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.22, p=0.27, n=11), Apgar scores (g=0.13, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.54, p=0.53, n=4), and gestational age (g=0.03, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.54, p=0.49, n=10) were not significantly affected. Other offspring outcomes could not be meta-analyzed due to the inconsistent reporting of offspring outcomes and an insufficient number of studies.ConclusionsNon-pharmacological interventions had no significant effect on birth outcomes, although this outcome should be considered with caution due to the risk of biases. No randomized controlled trial examined the effects of prenatal pharmacological treatments as compared to treatment as usual for common mental disorders on offspring outcomes. Present clinical guidelines may require more research evidence on offspring outcomes, including child development, in order to warrant the current recommendation to routinely screen and subsequently treat prenatal common mental disorders.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42016047190
KW - Common mental disorders
KW - Prenatal interventions
KW - Offspring
KW - Child
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Antidepressant
KW - Psychotherapy
KW - Depression
KW - Anxiety
KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
KW - STRESS-MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION
KW - COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY
KW - AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
KW - FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE
KW - LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT
KW - ANTIDEPRESSANT USE
KW - PREGNANT-WOMEN
KW - PRETERM BIRTH
KW - DEPRESSION INTERVENTION
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-018-1192-6
DO - 10.1186/s12916-018-1192-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 16
JO - BMC Medicine
JF - BMC Medicine
ER -