Peter Auriol and Adam Wodeham on Perception and Judgment

OnderzoeksoutputAcademic

44 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Peter Auriol’s claim that the direct objects of perception enjoy a mind-dependent kind of being elicited strong reactions from his contemporaries. According to Adam Wodeham, no special ontology of apparent being is needed in order to account for the cases of perceptual illusion cited by Auriol. Wodeham goes on, in order for a dog to have anything like the human appearance of a bent stick, it must be able to form a sentence saying that the stick is bent. According to Wodeham, when a dog looks at a stick that is half merged into water, it receives what he calls a simple vision of the stick. According to Wodeham, for an intuition to give us certainty about the contingent present is for that intuition to yield a judgment about the contingent present that is certain. A judgment counts as knowledge, Wodeham explains, when it is evident.
Originele taal-2English
TitelThe Senses and the History of Philosophy
RedacteurenBrian Glenney, José Filipe Silva
UitgeverijRoutledge
Hoofdstuk8
Pagina's149-162
Aantal pagina's14
ISBN van elektronische versie9781315184418
ISBN van geprinte versie9781138738997
DOI's
StatusPublished - 2019

Citeer dit