Philosophy of Science and The Replicability Crisis

Felipe Romero*

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

17 Citaten (Scopus)
217 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years, important published findings in the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences have failed to replicate, suggesting that these fields are facing a “replicability crisis.” For philosophers, the crisis should not be taken as bad news but as an opportunity to do work on several fronts, including conceptual analysis, history and philosophy of science, research ethics, and social epistemology. This article introduces philosophers to these discussions. First, I discuss precedents and evidence for the crisis. Second, I discuss methodological, statistical, and social‐structural factors that have contributed to the crisis. Third, I focus on the philosophical issues raised by the crisis. Finally, I discuss several proposals for solutions and highlight the gaps that philosophers could focus on.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1-14
Aantal pagina's15
TijdschriftPhilosophy Compass
Volume14
Nummer van het tijdschrift11
DOI's
StatusPublished - 22-nov-2019

Citeer dit