Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies

Jan Albert van Laar; Erik C. W. Krabbe

Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies

Onderzoeksoutput › Academic

10 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert pressure on others through sanctions or rewards. Finally, we discuss from the viewpoints of persuasion and negotiation whether and, if so, how pressure hinders the achievement of a reasonable outcome.

Originele taal-2	English
Titel	Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Redacteuren	Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell, Jean Wagemans
Plaats van productie	Amsterdam
Uitgeverij	Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation
Pagina's	702-709
Aantal pagina's	8
ISBN van elektronische versie	9789090316369
Status	Published - 2019
Evenement	9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Duur: 3-jul.-2018 → 6-jul.-2018 Congresnummer: 9

Conference

Conference	9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Verkorte titel	9th ISSA Conference
Land/Regio	Netherlands
Stad	Amsterdam
Periode	03/07/2018 → 06/07/2018

Toegang tot document

Pressure and Argumentation in Public ControversiesFinal publisher's version, 847 KBLicentie: Taverne

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Andere bestanden en links

https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf

Citeer dit

@inproceedings{a50872fd620d4c8d9822307b7961221f,

title = "Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies",

abstract = "When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert pressure on others through sanctions or rewards. Finally, we discuss from the viewpoints of persuasion and negotiation whether and, if so, how pressure hinders the achievement of a reasonable outcome. ",

keywords = ": argumentation, fallacies, negotiation dialogue, persuasion dialogue, pressure, public controversy",

author = "{van Laar}, {Jan Albert} and Krabbe, {Erik C. W.}",

note = "Translation of the Dutch version: Pressie en argumentatie in maatschappelijke discussies (2019).; 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation , 9th ISSA Conference ; Conference date: 03-07-2018 Through 06-07-2018",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

pages = "702--709",

editor = "Bart Garssen and David Godden and Gordon Mitchell and Jean Wagemans",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation",

publisher = "Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation",

}

van Laar, JA & Krabbe, ECW 2019, Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies. in B Garssen, D Godden, G Mitchell & J Wagemans (uitgave), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, blz. 702-709, 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation , Amsterdam, Netherlands, 03/07/2018.

Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies. / van Laar, Jan Albert ; Krabbe, Erik C. W.
Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. uitgave / Bart Garssen; David Godden; Gordon Mitchell; Jean Wagemans. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, 2019. blz. 702-709.

Onderzoeksoutput › Academic

TY - GEN

T1 - Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies

AU - van Laar, Jan Albert

AU - Krabbe, Erik C. W.

N1 - Conference code: 9

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert pressure on others through sanctions or rewards. Finally, we discuss from the viewpoints of persuasion and negotiation whether and, if so, how pressure hinders the achievement of a reasonable outcome.

AB - When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert pressure on others through sanctions or rewards. Finally, we discuss from the viewpoints of persuasion and negotiation whether and, if so, how pressure hinders the achievement of a reasonable outcome.

KW - : argumentation, fallacies, negotiation dialogue, persuasion dialogue, pressure, public controversy

UR - https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 702

EP - 709

BT - Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation

A2 - Garssen, Bart

A2 - Godden, David

A2 - Mitchell, Gordon

A2 - Wagemans, Jean

PB - Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation

CY - Amsterdam

T2 - 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation

Y2 - 3 July 2018 through 6 July 2018

ER -

Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies

Samenvatting

Conference

Toegang tot document

Handle.net

Andere bestanden en links

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit