TY - JOUR
T1 - Promotional language in radiology publications
T2 - Increasing use of excellent, favorable, promising, robust, and unique
AU - Kwee, Thomas Christian
AU - Kwee, Robert Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/2/19
Y1 - 2023/2/19
N2 - Purpose: To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.Materials and Methods: This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.Results: Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: excellent (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), favorable (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), promising (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), robust (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and unique (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.Conclusion: Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades. Key Points: Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022 Excellent, favorable, promising, robust, and unique were most often used This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.
AB - Purpose: To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.Materials and Methods: This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.Results: Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: excellent (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), favorable (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), promising (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), robust (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and unique (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.Conclusion: Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades. Key Points: Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022 Excellent, favorable, promising, robust, and unique were most often used This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.
KW - bias
KW - communication
KW - medical imaging
KW - publishing
KW - radiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185811803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/a-2224-9357
DO - 10.1055/a-2224-9357
M3 - Article
C2 - 38373713
AN - SCOPUS:85185811803
SN - 1438-9029
JO - RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren
JF - RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren
ER -