Proportion of false-positive follow-up FDG-PET scans in lymphoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Hugo J. A. Adams*, Thomas C. Kwee

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutputpeer review

10 Citaten (Scopus)
241 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

This study aimed to assess the false-positive proportion of follow-up 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in lymphoma patients who initially achieved an end-of-treatment complete remission, using biopsy as reference standard.

Medline was searched for original studies, studies were methodologically evaluated and results were meta analytically summarized. Proportion of false-positive results ranged between 9.5%-90.0%, with a weighted summary proportion (random effects) of 42.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.0%-58.0%). A separate subgroup analysis in symptomatic patients only again revealed a relatively high summary proportion of false positive follow-up FDG-PET of 37.5% (random effects). In conclusion, the false-positive proportion of follow-up FDG-PET in lymphoma patients who initially achieved an end-of-treatment complete remission is high and remains high when a combination of clinical symptoms and follow-up FDG-PET is used. Therefore, biopsy remains compulsory and follow-up FDG-PET alone may be regarded as unreliable to define progression-free survival.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)73-81
Aantal pagina's9
TijdschriftCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Volume141
DOI's
StatusPublished - sep.-2019

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Proportion of false-positive follow-up FDG-PET scans in lymphoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit