Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

Denise G Tate; Tracey Wheeler; Giulia I Lane; Martin Forchheimer; Kim D Anderson; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Anne P Cameron; Bruno Gallo Santacruz; Lyn B Jakeman; Michael J Kennelly; Steve Kirshblum; Andrei Krassioukov; Klaus Krogh; M J Mulcahey; Vanessa K Noonan; Gianna M Rodriguez; Ann M Spungen; David Tulsky; Marcel W Post

doi:10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033

Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

Denise G Tate^*, Tracey Wheeler, Giulia I Lane, Martin Forchheimer, Kim D Anderson, Fin Biering-Sorensen, Anne P Cameron, Bruno Gallo Santacruz, Lyn B Jakeman, Michael J Kennelly, Steve Kirshblum, Andrei Krassioukov, Klaus Krogh, M J Mulcahey, Vanessa K Noonan, Gianna M Rodriguez, Ann M Spungen, David Tulsky, Marcel W Post

^*Corresponding author voor dit werk

EXtremities Pain Active lifestyle aNd Disability (EXPAND)

Onderzoeksoutput › peer review

69 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.

Originele taal-2	English
Pagina's (van-tot)	141-164
Aantal pagina's	24
Tijdschrift	Journal of spinal cord medicine
Volume	43
Nummer van het tijdschrift	2
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033
Status	Published - 3-mrt.-2020

Toegang tot document

10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Citeer dit

Tate, D. G., Wheeler, T., Lane, G. I., Forchheimer, M., Anderson, K. D., Biering-Sorensen, F., Cameron, A. P., Santacruz, B. G., Jakeman, L. B., Kennelly, M. J., Kirshblum, S., Krassioukov, A., Krogh, K., Mulcahey, M. J., Noonan, V. K., Rodriguez, G. M., Spungen, A. M., Tulsky, D., & Post, M. W. (2020). Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease. Journal of spinal cord medicine, 43(2), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033

@article{290209c0973845ce841c13a234b799cd,

title = "Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease",

abstract = "Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.",

author = "Tate, {Denise G} and Tracey Wheeler and Lane, {Giulia I} and Martin Forchheimer and Anderson, {Kim D} and Fin Biering-Sorensen and Cameron, {Anne P} and Santacruz, {Bruno Gallo} and Jakeman, {Lyn B} and Kennelly, {Michael J} and Steve Kirshblum and Andrei Krassioukov and Klaus Krogh and Mulcahey, {M J} and Noonan, {Vanessa K} and Rodriguez, {Gianna M} and Spungen, {Ann M} and David Tulsky and Post, {Marcel W}",

year = "2020",

month = mar,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "141--164",

journal = "Journal of spinal cord medicine",

issn = "1079-0268",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis Group",

number = "2",

}

Tate, DG, Wheeler, T, Lane, GI, Forchheimer, M, Anderson, KD, Biering-Sorensen, F, Cameron, AP, Santacruz, BG, Jakeman, LB, Kennelly, MJ, Kirshblum, S, Krassioukov, A, Krogh, K, Mulcahey, MJ, Noonan, VK, Rodriguez, GM, Spungen, AM, Tulsky, D & Post, MW 2020, 'Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease', Journal of spinal cord medicine, vol. 43, nr. 2, blz. 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

AU - Tate, Denise G

AU - Wheeler, Tracey

AU - Lane, Giulia I

AU - Forchheimer, Martin

AU - Anderson, Kim D

AU - Biering-Sorensen, Fin

AU - Cameron, Anne P

AU - Santacruz, Bruno Gallo

AU - Jakeman, Lyn B

AU - Kennelly, Michael J

AU - Kirshblum, Steve

AU - Krassioukov, Andrei

AU - Krogh, Klaus

AU - Mulcahey, M J

AU - Noonan, Vanessa K

AU - Rodriguez, Gianna M

AU - Spungen, Ann M

AU - Tulsky, David

AU - Post, Marcel W

PY - 2020/3/3

Y1 - 2020/3/3

N2 - Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.

AB - Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.

U2 - 10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033

DO - 10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033

M3 - Review article

C2 - 32105586

SN - 1079-0268

VL - 43

SP - 141

EP - 164

JO - Journal of spinal cord medicine

JF - Journal of spinal cord medicine

IS - 2

ER -

Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

Samenvatting

Toegang tot document

Handle.net

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit