Regulatory Agencies and Private Damages in the EU: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice

O.O. Cherednychenko*

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

4 Citaten (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Regulatory agencies have traditionally been concerned with deterring unlawful conduct in the public interest. This article explores the emerging role of agencies in securing compensation for individuals in mass damage situations resulting from violations of EU private law. It identifies three main models of the relationship between administrative enforcement and private law remedies, notably damages, within the agencies’ operation: (1) separation, (2) complementarity, and (3) integration. These models reflect elements of the current legislative and agency practices in a variety of jurisdictions across different areas of EU private law and provide an analytical framework for assessing such practices in terms of their potential to reconcile the pursuit of the public interest with a concern to ensure justice between private parties. The analysis points to the need to systematically rethink the prevailing regulatory theory concerning the tasks of regulatory agencies along the lines of a holistic approach to deterrence and compensation.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)146-171
Aantal pagina's26
TijdschriftYearbook of European Law
Volume40
DOI's
StatusPublished - 2021

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Regulatory Agencies and Private Damages in the EU: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit