Renal Function Equations before and after Living Kidney Donation: A Within-Individual Comparison of Performance at Different Levels of Renal Function

Hilde Tent*, Mieneke Rook, Lesley A. Stevens, Willem J. van Son, L. Joost van Pelt, H. Sijbrand Hofker, Rutger J. Ploeg, Jaap J. Homan van der Heide, Gerjan Navis

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

63 Citaten (Scopus)


Background and objectives: The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation and the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation perform poorly in the (near-) normal range of GFR. Whether this is due to the level of GFR as such or to differences in individual characteristics between healthy individuals and patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We evaluated the performance of MDRD, CG per BSA (CG/(BSA)) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations compared with measured GFR (mGFR; I-iothalamate) at 4 months before and 2 months after donation in 253 consecutive living kidney donors.

Results: mGFR declined from 103 +/- 15 to 66 +/- 11 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) after donation. All equations underestimated mGFR at both time points. Arithmetic performance analysis showed improved performance after donation of all equations, with significant reduction of bias after donation. Expressed as percentage difference, mGFR-estimated GFR (eGFR) bias was reduced after donation only for CG/(BSA). Finally, in 295 unselected individuals who were screened for donation, mGFR was below the cutoff for donation of 80 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in 19 individual but in 166, 98, and 74 for MDRD, CDK-EPI, and CG/(BSA), respectively.

Conclusions: A higher level of GFR as such is associated with larger absolute underestimation of true GFR by eGFR. For donor screening purposes, eGFR should be interpreted with great caution; when in doubt, true GFR should be performed to prevent unjustified decline of prospective kidney donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 1960-1968, 2010. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08761209

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1960-1968
Aantal pagina's9
TijdschriftClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Nummer van het tijdschrift11
StatusPublished - nov-2010

Citeer dit