TY - JOUR
T1 - Retaining forests within agricultural landscapes as a pathway to sustainable intensification
T2 - Evidence from Southern Ethiopia
AU - Duriaux Chavarría, Jean Yves
AU - Baudron, Frédéric
AU - Sunderland, Terry
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was implemented by CIMMYT and CIFOR as part of the project ‘The New Agrarian Change’, made possible by the generous support of the Department for International Development (DFID) , the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) , and CRP WHEAT ( www.wheat.org ). Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of DFID, USAID, and CRP WHEAT. We thank Kedir Gemedo, Hamid Tura, and Genemo Teshite for assisting with fieldwork. Our deepest gratitude goes to the community leaders and farmers who welcomed us and were so patient and helpful during data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - There are increasing calls in Africa for ‘sustainable intensification’ of agriculture with the aim of increasing productivity whilst minimizing the negative environmental and social impacts. This paper questions whether adopting a landscape approach—and in particular the retention of forests within agricultural landscapes—could fulfill these goals for smallholder farmers in some regions of Africa. Using a landscape in Southern Ethiopia comprised of three zones of increasing distance from a legally protected forestas a case study, the performance of a stratified sample of 27 farms was assessed through detailed surveys and empirical measurements. While livestock productivity was found to be higher closer to the forest, no difference was found for crop or total farm productivities across the three zones. Partial nutrient balances (a productivity dimension of farm sustainability), redundancy (a proxy of resilience), and equality in the distribution of livestock increased with increasing proximity to the forest. Dependency on external inputs also decreased with increasing proximity to the forest. We conclude that, under certain conditions, the retention of forests in agricultural landscapes, and the use of these forests for livestock grazing and fuelwood collection, may promote sustainability, greater resilience and equality of smallholder farming systems, without compromising on-farm productivity. Thus, landscape approaches may provide a pathway to sustainable intensification, and may represent a research and development arena that deserves increasing attention in the sustainable intensification debate.
AB - There are increasing calls in Africa for ‘sustainable intensification’ of agriculture with the aim of increasing productivity whilst minimizing the negative environmental and social impacts. This paper questions whether adopting a landscape approach—and in particular the retention of forests within agricultural landscapes—could fulfill these goals for smallholder farmers in some regions of Africa. Using a landscape in Southern Ethiopia comprised of three zones of increasing distance from a legally protected forestas a case study, the performance of a stratified sample of 27 farms was assessed through detailed surveys and empirical measurements. While livestock productivity was found to be higher closer to the forest, no difference was found for crop or total farm productivities across the three zones. Partial nutrient balances (a productivity dimension of farm sustainability), redundancy (a proxy of resilience), and equality in the distribution of livestock increased with increasing proximity to the forest. Dependency on external inputs also decreased with increasing proximity to the forest. We conclude that, under certain conditions, the retention of forests in agricultural landscapes, and the use of these forests for livestock grazing and fuelwood collection, may promote sustainability, greater resilience and equality of smallholder farming systems, without compromising on-farm productivity. Thus, landscape approaches may provide a pathway to sustainable intensification, and may represent a research and development arena that deserves increasing attention in the sustainable intensification debate.
KW - Common resource pools
KW - Equality
KW - Multi-functional landscapes
KW - Productivity
KW - Resilience
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046748167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.020
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046748167
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 263
SP - 41
EP - 52
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
ER -