Splitting a Difference of Opinion

OnderzoeksoutputAcademic

81 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

When unable to resolve a conflict of opinion about the objective worth of an action proposal, discussants may choose to negotiate for a compromise. Is it legitimate to abandon the search for a resolution, and instead enter into a negotiation that aims at settling the difference of opinion? What is the nature of a compromise, in contradistinction to a resolution? What kinds of argument do participants typically put to use in their negotiation dialogues?
Originele taal-2English
TitelArgumentation, Objectivity, and Bias
SubtitelProceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016
RedacteurenPat Bondy, Laura Benacquista
Plaats van productieWindsor, Ontario
UitgeverijOSSA
Pagina's1-19
Aantal pagina's19
StatusPublished - 2016
Evenement11th OSSA Conference: Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias - Windsor, Canada
Duur: 18-mei-201621-mei-2016

Conference

Conference11th OSSA Conference
Land/RegioCanada
StadWindsor
Periode18/05/201621/05/2016

Citeer dit