Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Emma A. Gans*, Liza A.M. van Mun, Janke F. de Groot, Barbara C. van Munster, Ester A. Rake, Julia C.M. van Weert, Suzanne Festen, Frederiek van den Bos

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutputpeer review

4 Citaten (Scopus)
68 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Objective: To systematically review randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of Decision Aids (DAs) compared to usual care or alternative interventions for older patients facing treatment, screening, or care decisions.

Methods: A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies included patients ≥ 65 years or reported a mean of ≥ 70 years. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice made and decision making process, user experience and ways in which DAs were tailored to older patients. Meta-analysis was conducted, if possible, or outcomes were synthesized descriptively.

Results: Overall, 15 studies were included. Using DAs were effective in increasing knowledge (SMD 0.90; 95% CI [0.48, 1.32]), decreasing decisional conflict (SMD −0.15; 95% CI [−0.29, −0.01]), improving patient-provider communication (RR 1.67; 95% CI [1.21, 2.29]), and preparing patients to make an individualized decision (MD 35.7%; 95% CI [26.8, 44.6]). Nine studies provided details on how the DA was tailored to older patients.

Conclusion: This review shows a number of favourable results for the effectiveness of DAs in decision making with older patients.

Practice implications: Current DAs can be used to support shared decision making with older patients when faced with treatment, screening or care decisions.

Originele taal-2English
Artikelnummer107981
Aantal pagina's28
TijdschriftPatient Education and Counseling
Volume116
DOI's
StatusPublished - nov.-2023

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit