The concentration-stability controversy in banking: New evidence from the EU-25

Pieter IJtsma*, Laura Spierdijk, Sherrill Shaffer

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput: ArticleAcademicpeer review

63 Citaten (Scopus)
320 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

This study explores whether the concentration-stability relation is affected by the level of analysis; i.e., bank-level versus country-level stability. The diverging results in the literature suggest that we may indeed expect differences between the two levels. With the z-score as the measure of financial stability, our theoretical analysis confirms that we may find such differences. Yet our empirical analysis for the EU-25 during the 1998-2014 period finds no economically significant effect of concentration on either the bank-level or the country-level z-score. The finding that concentration hardly affects stability at both levels of analysis is an indication of robustness in the empirical concentration-stability relation not previously established in the literature. This finding further suggests that neither supervisory restructuring, nor normal market-driven mergers, are likely to be substantially harmful to financial stability. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)273-284
Aantal pagina's12
TijdschriftJournal of Financial Stability
Volume33
DOI's
StatusPublished - dec.-2017
Evenement5th International Conference of the Financial-Engineering-and-Banking-Society (FEBS) - Nantes, France
Duur: 11-jun.-201513-jun.-2015

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The concentration-stability controversy in banking: New evidence from the EU-25'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit