The ECHR and the Positive Obligation to Criminalise Domestic Psychological Violence

Niels Hedlund*

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

    OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

    108 Downloads (Pure)

    Samenvatting

    This article explores the scope of the positive obligation deriving from the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to criminalise forms of domestic psychological violence. This is primarily done by examining the implications of Volodina v Russia (No. 1), Volodina v Russia (No. 2) and Tunikova and Others v Russia regarding the obligation in question. Additionally, this article addresses different legislative approaches towards the criminalisation of domestic violence that have been distinguished by the ECtHR and discusses whether they adequately criminalise domestic psychological violence. Some approaches appear ill-suited as they concern national offences that focus on serious incidents. Domestic psychological violence, on the other hand, can involve a course of conduct consisting of seemingly minor incidents. It is concluded that State Parties should review to what extent such forms of psychological violence are criminalised under their national criminal laws.

    Originele taal-2English
    Artikelnummerngae019
    Aantal pagina's22
    TijdschriftHuman Rights Law Review
    Volume24
    Nummer van het tijdschrift3
    DOI's
    StatusPublished - 1-sep.-2024

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The ECHR and the Positive Obligation to Criminalise Domestic Psychological Violence'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit