TY - JOUR
T1 - The economic impact of machine perfusion technology in liver transplantation
AU - Boteon, Yuri L
AU - Hessheimer, Amelia J
AU - Brüggenwirth, Isabel M A
AU - Boteon, Amanda P C S
AU - Padilla, María
AU - de Meijer, Vincent E
AU - Domínguez-Gil, Beatriz
AU - Porte, Robert J
AU - Perera, M Thamara P R
AU - Martins, Paulo N
N1 - © 2021 International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Introduction: Several clinical studies have demonstrated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of machine perfusion in liver transplantation, although its economic outcomes are still underexplored. This review aimed to examine the costs related to machine perfusion and its associated outcomes.Methods: Expert opinion of several groups representing different machine perfusion modalities. Critical analysis of the published literature reporting the economic outcomes of the most used techniques of machine perfusion in liver transplantation (normothermic and hypothermic ex situ machine perfusion and in situ normothermic regional perfusion).Results: Machine perfusion costs include disposable components of the perfusion device, perfusate components, personnel and facility fees, and depreciation of the perfusion device or device lease fee. The limited current literature suggests that although this upfront cost varies between perfusion modalities, its use is highly likely to be cost-effective. Optimization of the donor liver utilization rate, local conditions of transplant programs (long waiting list times and higher MELD scores), a decreased rate of complications, changes in logistics, and length of hospital stay are potential cost savings points that must highlight the expected benefits of this intervention. An additional unaccounted factor is that machine perfusion optimizing donor organ utilization allows patients to be transplanted earlier, avoiding clinical deterioration while on the waiting list and the costs associated with hospital admissions and other required procedures.Conclusion: So far, the clinical benefits have guided machine perfusion implementation in liver transplantation. Albeit there is data suggesting the economic benefit of the technique, further investigation of its costs to healthcare systems and society and associated outcomes is needed.
AB - Introduction: Several clinical studies have demonstrated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of machine perfusion in liver transplantation, although its economic outcomes are still underexplored. This review aimed to examine the costs related to machine perfusion and its associated outcomes.Methods: Expert opinion of several groups representing different machine perfusion modalities. Critical analysis of the published literature reporting the economic outcomes of the most used techniques of machine perfusion in liver transplantation (normothermic and hypothermic ex situ machine perfusion and in situ normothermic regional perfusion).Results: Machine perfusion costs include disposable components of the perfusion device, perfusate components, personnel and facility fees, and depreciation of the perfusion device or device lease fee. The limited current literature suggests that although this upfront cost varies between perfusion modalities, its use is highly likely to be cost-effective. Optimization of the donor liver utilization rate, local conditions of transplant programs (long waiting list times and higher MELD scores), a decreased rate of complications, changes in logistics, and length of hospital stay are potential cost savings points that must highlight the expected benefits of this intervention. An additional unaccounted factor is that machine perfusion optimizing donor organ utilization allows patients to be transplanted earlier, avoiding clinical deterioration while on the waiting list and the costs associated with hospital admissions and other required procedures.Conclusion: So far, the clinical benefits have guided machine perfusion implementation in liver transplantation. Albeit there is data suggesting the economic benefit of the technique, further investigation of its costs to healthcare systems and society and associated outcomes is needed.
KW - cost-analysis
KW - health economics
KW - hypothermic machine perfusion
KW - liver transplantation
KW - machine perfusion of the liver
KW - normothermic machine perfusion
KW - normothermic regional perfusion
KW - PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
KW - OUTCOMES RESEARCH
KW - HEALTH ECONOMICS
KW - PRESERVATION
U2 - 10.1111/aor.14131
DO - 10.1111/aor.14131
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34878658
SN - 0160-564X
VL - 46
SP - 191
EP - 200
JO - ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
JF - ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
IS - 2
ER -