TY - JOUR
T1 - The mechanism of disaster capitalism and the failure to build community resilience
T2 - learning from the 2009 earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy
AU - Imperiale, Angelo Jonas
AU - Vanclay, Frank
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - This paper reflects on what materialised during recovery operations following the earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy, on 6 April 2009. Previous critiques have focused on the actions of the Government of Italy and the Department of Civil Protection (Protezione Civile), with little attention paid to the role of local authorities. This analysis sheds light on how the latter used emergency powers, the command-and-control approach, and top-down planning to manage the disaster context, especially in terms of removal of rubble, implementing safety measures, and allocating temporary accommodation. It discusses how these arrangements constituted the mechanism via which ‘disaster capitalism’ took hold at the local and national level, and how it violated human rights, produced environmental and social impacts, hindered local communities from learning, transforming, and building resilience, and facilitated disaster capitalism and corruption. To make the disaster risk reduction and resilience paradigm more effective, a shift from centralised civil protection to decentralised, inclusive community empowerment systems is needed.
AB - This paper reflects on what materialised during recovery operations following the earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy, on 6 April 2009. Previous critiques have focused on the actions of the Government of Italy and the Department of Civil Protection (Protezione Civile), with little attention paid to the role of local authorities. This analysis sheds light on how the latter used emergency powers, the command-and-control approach, and top-down planning to manage the disaster context, especially in terms of removal of rubble, implementing safety measures, and allocating temporary accommodation. It discusses how these arrangements constituted the mechanism via which ‘disaster capitalism’ took hold at the local and national level, and how it violated human rights, produced environmental and social impacts, hindered local communities from learning, transforming, and building resilience, and facilitated disaster capitalism and corruption. To make the disaster risk reduction and resilience paradigm more effective, a shift from centralised civil protection to decentralised, inclusive community empowerment systems is needed.
KW - Disaster risk reduction
KW - Social dimensions of disaster
KW - Disaster capitalism
KW - Sociology of disasters
KW - Disaster management
KW - Community resilience
KW - disaster governance
U2 - 10.1111/disa.12431
DO - 10.1111/disa.12431
M3 - Article
SN - 0361-3666
VL - 45
SP - 555
EP - 576
JO - Disasters
JF - Disasters
IS - 3
ER -