The Political Dimension of COVID-19 Health-Protective Behavior in the United States

Wolfgang Stroebe, Michelle vanDellen*, Georgios Abakoumkin, Edward Lemay, Max Agostini, Jocelyn J. Belanger, Ben Gützkow, Anita Keller, Jannis Kreienkamp, Anne Margit Reitsema, Jamilah Hanum Abdul Khaiyom, Handan Akkas, Carlos A Almenara, Anton Kurapov, Mohsin Atta, S. Cigdem Bagci, Sima Basel, Berisha Kida, Bertus F. Jeronimus, Nicholas ButtrickJoshua Krause, Solomiia Myroniuk Myroniuk, Maja Kutlaca, Yasin Koc, Arie W. Kruglanski, Kira McCabe, Nora Anna Lantos, Joonha Park, Claudia Nisa, Evgeny Osin, Gennaro Pica, Jonas Rees, Elena Resta, Jolien van Breen, Caspar J. van Lissa, Bang Zheng, Kees van Veen, Pontus Leander

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput: Working paperAcademic

Samenvatting

According to health behavior theories, perceived vulnerability to a health threat and perceived effectiveness of recommended health-protective behaviors determine motivation to follow these recommendations. Because the U.S. President Trump and U.S. conservative politicians downplayed the risk and seriousness of contracting COVID-19 and the effectiveness of recommended actions, we predicted that politically conservative Americans would be less likely than liberals to enact recommended health-protective behaviors. We further predicted that these effects would be mediated by perceived health risk, perceived infection severity and perceived action effectiveness. In two studies of U.S. residents, political conservatism was inversely associated with perceived health risk and enactment of health-protective behaviors. Furthermore, perceived risk of infection (both studies), perceived severity of infection (Study 2), and perceived effectiveness of behaviors (Study 2), mediated effects of political orientation on health-protective behaviors. These effects were stronger for participants living in the U.S. (N=10,923) than outside the U.S. (N=51,986).
Originele taal-2English
StatusSubmitted - nov-2020

Citeer dit