TY - JOUR
T1 - The quadrature method
T2 - A novel dipole localisation algorithm for artificial lateral lines compared to state of the art
AU - Bot, Daniël M.
AU - Wolf, Ben J.
AU - van Netten, Sietse M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research has been partly supported by the Lakhsmi project (B.J.W., S.M.v.N.) that has received funding from (1) the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 635568 and (2) the SeaClear project (B.J.W.) that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 871295 and (3) the Flemish Government programme “Onderzoeksprogramma Artificiële Intelligentie (AI)” (D.M.B.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/2
Y1 - 2021/7/2
N2 - The lateral line organ of fish has inspired engineers to develop flow sensor arrays— dubbed artificial lateral lines (ALLs)—capable of detecting near-field hydrodynamic events for obstacle avoidance and object detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review and comparison of ten localisation algorithms for ALLs. Differences in the studied domain, sensor sensitivity axes, and available data prevent a fair comparison between these algorithms from their original works. We compare them with our novel quadrature method (QM), which is based on a geometric property specific to 2D-sensitive ALLs. We show how the area in which each algorithm can accurately determine the position and orientation of a simulated dipole source is affected by (1) the amount of training and optimisation data, and (2) the sensitivity axes of the sensors. Overall, we find that each algorithm benefits from 2D-sensitive sensors, with alternating sensitivity axes as the second-best configuration. From the machine learning approaches, an MLP required an impractically large training set to approach the optimisation-based algorithms’ performance. Regardless of the data set size, QM performs best with both a large area for accurate predictions and a small tail of large errors.
AB - The lateral line organ of fish has inspired engineers to develop flow sensor arrays— dubbed artificial lateral lines (ALLs)—capable of detecting near-field hydrodynamic events for obstacle avoidance and object detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review and comparison of ten localisation algorithms for ALLs. Differences in the studied domain, sensor sensitivity axes, and available data prevent a fair comparison between these algorithms from their original works. We compare them with our novel quadrature method (QM), which is based on a geometric property specific to 2D-sensitive ALLs. We show how the area in which each algorithm can accurately determine the position and orientation of a simulated dipole source is affected by (1) the amount of training and optimisation data, and (2) the sensitivity axes of the sensors. Overall, we find that each algorithm benefits from 2D-sensitive sensors, with alternating sensitivity axes as the second-best configuration. From the machine learning approaches, an MLP required an impractically large training set to approach the optimisation-based algorithms’ performance. Regardless of the data set size, QM performs best with both a large area for accurate predictions and a small tail of large errors.
KW - Artificial lateral line
KW - Dipole localisation
KW - Hydrodynamic imaging
KW - Neural networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108944371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/s21134558
DO - 10.3390/s21134558
M3 - Article
C2 - 34283129
AN - SCOPUS:85108944371
SN - 1424-8220
VL - 21
JO - Sensors
JF - Sensors
IS - 13
M1 - 4558
ER -