Web-based consultation between general practitioners and nephrologists: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Vincent A. van Gelder*, Nynke D. Scherpbier-de Haan, Saskia van Berkel, Reinier P. Akkermans, Inge S. de Grauw, Eddy M. Adang, Pim J. Assendelft, Wim J.C. de Grauw, Marion C.J. Biermans, Jack F.M. Wetzels

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

17 Citaten (Scopus)


Background. Consultation of a nephrologist is important in aligning care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the primary-secondary care interface. However, current consultation methods come with practical difficulties that can lead to postponed consultation or patient referral instead. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether a web-based consultation platform, telenephrology, led to a lower referral rate of indicated patients. Furthermore, we assessed consultation rate, quality of care, costs and general practitioner (GPs') experiences with telenephrology. Methods. Cluster randomized controlled trial with 47 general practices in the Netherlands was randomized to access to telenephrology or to enhanced usual care. A total of 3004 CKD patients aged 18 years or older who were under primary care were included (intervention group n = 1277, control group n = 1727) and 2693 completed the trial. All practices participated in a CKD management course and were given an overview of their CKD patients. Results. The referral rates amounted to 2.3% (n = 29) in the intervention group and 3.0% (n = 52) in the control group, which was a non-significant difference, OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.23. The intervention group's consultation rate was 6.3% (n = 81) against 5.0% (n = 87) (OR 2.00; 95% CI 0.75-5.33). We found no difference in quality of care or costs. The majority of GPs had a positive opinion about telenephrology. Conclusion. The data in our study do not allow for conclusions on the effect of telenephrology on the rate of patient referrals and provider-to-provider consultations, compared to conventional methods. It was positively evaluated by GPs and was non-inferior in terms of quality of care and costs.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)430-436
Aantal pagina's7
TijdschriftFamily practice
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
StatusPublished - aug.-2017
Extern gepubliceerdJa


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Web-based consultation between general practitioners and nephrologists: A cluster randomized controlled trial'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit