What Defines Success When Visions Compete: Lessons from Post-Katrina New Orleans

Terry van Dijk*, Gerd Weitkamp

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

1 Citaat (Scopus)
293 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Visions can be valuable tools for guiding and uniting land use interests in a region with fragmented administration. What determines the strength of a vision and how can it effectively play its role? Our study tested and supplemented hypotheses on the success factors of visions. We chose a city in a rebuilding process because that represents a most intensive and pressing vision process. We interviewed local policy-makers, designers, researchers, and journalists to find out what they would spontaneously cite as a vision’s most crucial factors. We also reviewed the subsequent New Orleans recovery plans and compared our findings with hypotheses from visioning literature. The interviewees’ spontaneous answers largely confirm the key hypotheses about success from the visioning literature. However, the most frequently mentioned factors were not in the literature: a vision needs to be propagated by a powerful authority, a favourable larger political climate, and the funds to sustain the implementation process. For a vision to make a difference, it needs to be substantively relevant and persuasive but also have a favourable institutional climate to help it along.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)350-365
Aantal pagina's16
TijdschriftInternational Planning Studies
Volume22
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
Vroegere onlinedatum1-mrt.-2017
DOI's
StatusPublished - 2017

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'What Defines Success When Visions Compete: Lessons from Post-Katrina New Orleans'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit