TY - JOUR
T1 - What is the influence of the operator on the long-term survival of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations in an undergraduate setting?
AU - Vosmeijer, F B
AU - Gresnigt, M M M
AU - Doeve, A J
AU - Packer, A
AU - Cune, M S
AU - de Kuijper, M C F M
N1 - Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the (undergraduate) operator on the survival and success rate of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received at least one posterior partial lithium disilicate restoration between 2009 and 2019 by undergraduates at the Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene in Groningen were included. Operator- (academic year (4th, 5th, 6th year)), patient- (presence of a nightguard, caries risk, age), tooth- (endodontic status, inlay/onlay, position of the restoration outline) and material-related factors (cement type, rubber dam use, Immediate Dentin Sealing) on the survival and success rate were analyzed using multilevel Cox regression (p < 0.05).RESULTS: In total, 637 restorations were placed in 373 patients. On the level of survival, 100 restorations failed during the observation period (median follow-up: 70 months, interquartile range 48-99 months): 26 extractions, 61 restoration replacements and 13 biological complications. The overall 5- and 10-year cumulative survival rates were 89.1 % (95 % CI: 86.5 %-91.7 %) and 77.6 % (95 % CI: 73.1 % - 82.5 %) respectively. Multilevel Cox regression showed a medium to high caries risk (HR: 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.21 - 2.04) and an approximal outline located within 3 mm of the bone (HR: 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.05 - 2.22) as significant risk factors for failure. The academic year had no statistically significant effect.CONCLUSION: The 10-year survival and success of lithium disilicate posterior partial indirect restorations placed by undergraduates was not significantly affected by the academic year of the operator.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: When a clear treatment protocol is followed, patient- and tooth-related factors rather than academic year of the operator appear to have a significant influence on the quality of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the (undergraduate) operator on the survival and success rate of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received at least one posterior partial lithium disilicate restoration between 2009 and 2019 by undergraduates at the Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene in Groningen were included. Operator- (academic year (4th, 5th, 6th year)), patient- (presence of a nightguard, caries risk, age), tooth- (endodontic status, inlay/onlay, position of the restoration outline) and material-related factors (cement type, rubber dam use, Immediate Dentin Sealing) on the survival and success rate were analyzed using multilevel Cox regression (p < 0.05).RESULTS: In total, 637 restorations were placed in 373 patients. On the level of survival, 100 restorations failed during the observation period (median follow-up: 70 months, interquartile range 48-99 months): 26 extractions, 61 restoration replacements and 13 biological complications. The overall 5- and 10-year cumulative survival rates were 89.1 % (95 % CI: 86.5 %-91.7 %) and 77.6 % (95 % CI: 73.1 % - 82.5 %) respectively. Multilevel Cox regression showed a medium to high caries risk (HR: 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.21 - 2.04) and an approximal outline located within 3 mm of the bone (HR: 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.05 - 2.22) as significant risk factors for failure. The academic year had no statistically significant effect.CONCLUSION: The 10-year survival and success of lithium disilicate posterior partial indirect restorations placed by undergraduates was not significantly affected by the academic year of the operator.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: When a clear treatment protocol is followed, patient- and tooth-related factors rather than academic year of the operator appear to have a significant influence on the quality of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations.
KW - Dental restoration, permanent
KW - Immediate dentin sealing
KW - Lithium disilicate
KW - Partial indirect restoration
KW - Posterior
KW - Prosthodontics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212075662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105522
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105522
M3 - Article
C2 - 39653270
AN - SCOPUS:85212075662
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 153
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 105522
ER -