TY - JOUR
T1 - When abstraction does not increase stereotyping
T2 - Preparing for intragroup communication enables abstract construal of stereotype-inconsistent information
AU - Greijdanus, Hedy
AU - Postmes, Tom
AU - Gordijn, Ernestine H.
AU - van Zomeren, Martijn
PY - 2014/12
Y1 - 2014/12
N2 - Two experiments investigated when perceivers can construe stereotype-inconsistent information abstractly (i.e., interpret observations as generalizable) and whether stereotype-consistency delimits the positive relation between abstract construal level and stereotyping. Participants (N1=104, N2=83) prepared for intragroup communication or formed an individual impression without anticipating communication about a newspaper article describing outgroup members behaving stereotype-consistently or stereotype-inconsistently, and completed construal-level measures. Results supported our prediction that when people prepare communication, they prepare to share specific information (which may be stereotype-inconsistent) against the background of shared knowledge (often stereotypical). Communication thus creates the conditions for stereotype-inconsistent information to be processed abstractly. This effect occurred with centrally (Experiment2) and peripherally (Experiment1) presented stereotype-relevant information, in two different intergroup contexts. Additionally, Experiment2 demonstrated that abstract construal level increases stereotyping only if the construed information is stereotype-consistent. Thus, preparing for communication may be a key to stereotype change because it enables, through abstract construal, generalization of stereotype-inconsistency.
AB - Two experiments investigated when perceivers can construe stereotype-inconsistent information abstractly (i.e., interpret observations as generalizable) and whether stereotype-consistency delimits the positive relation between abstract construal level and stereotyping. Participants (N1=104, N2=83) prepared for intragroup communication or formed an individual impression without anticipating communication about a newspaper article describing outgroup members behaving stereotype-consistently or stereotype-inconsistently, and completed construal-level measures. Results supported our prediction that when people prepare communication, they prepare to share specific information (which may be stereotype-inconsistent) against the background of shared knowledge (often stereotypical). Communication thus creates the conditions for stereotype-inconsistent information to be processed abstractly. This effect occurred with centrally (Experiment2) and peripherally (Experiment1) presented stereotype-relevant information, in two different intergroup contexts. Additionally, Experiment2 demonstrated that abstract construal level increases stereotyping only if the construed information is stereotype-consistent. Thus, preparing for communication may be a key to stereotype change because it enables, through abstract construal, generalization of stereotype-inconsistency.
KW - SOCIALLY SITUATED COGNITION
KW - LINGUISTIC INTERGROUP BIAS
KW - ORDINAL INTERACTIONS
KW - PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE
KW - LANGUAGE ABSTRACTION
KW - TESTING HYPOTHESES
KW - LEVEL
KW - EXPECTANCIES
U2 - 10.1521/soco.2014.32.6.505
DO - 10.1521/soco.2014.32.6.505
M3 - Article
SN - 0278-016X
VL - 32
SP - 505
EP - 527
JO - Social Cognition
JF - Social Cognition
IS - 6
ER -